Hamrr connects to your ATS, inbox and calendar, evaluates the whole pipeline continuously, and returns a ranked list of the work that requires a person — with drafts prepared and held for approval.
Every desk in the office works to the same standard, and every action is filed against the person who approved it.
Metrics are attributed back to the roles, candidates and follow-up gaps producing them. Each finding is issued with its consequence and a prepared next step, so review time is spent deciding rather than diagnosing.
The same three lists whether you are running the desk or reviewing it, so a conversation starts from the record rather than from recollection.
Variance against benchmark, broken down by the roles and gaps responsible.
Three candidates have sat at interview for nine days with no feedback logged against them.
Shortlist submitted nine days ago; the hiring manager has not been chased since.
Offer with Daniel Kim. Closes at 41 days on acceptance, or reopens on Friday.
The remaining five roles average 27 days, inside benchmark.
What happens if the finding is left, and the action already drafted to close it.
Daniel Kim has not answered the Product Manager offer at Nexus Digital since Tuesday. On Friday the offer lapses, the role reopens and the placement is lost.
Priya Sharma has not replied to two emails. Her Senior Software Engineer interview at Acme Corp cannot be booked until she does.
Elena Volkov is still in screening for UX Designer at FinVault with no follow-up logged against her.
Figures shown from a sample desk.
Roles running short, people stuck in a stage and clients left unchased are one view across every open role. Each figure resolves back to the roles and people producing it, so a desk can be read without anyone stopping to write it up.
The same three lists for whoever reads them.
Every role with its depth against benchmark, how many are held for the client, and who is interviewing.
Four permission categories, each held at approval until it is explicitly delegated. Outbound messages and ATS writes are queued for review by default; deletions, cancellations and bulk changes cannot be delegated at all.
Each category is set per account, and switching one to automatic takes a confirmation naming what will start happening without you. Reverting takes none.
| Category | Scope | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Research & drafting | No outbound | Delegate first |
| Notes & record-keeping | Internal only | Ask me |
| Outreach & chases | Logged in full | Ask me |
| Stages & scheduling | Reversible | Ask me |
| Deletions & bulk changes | Not delegable | |
Switching one category to automatic states what will change before it takes effect. Reverting is immediate and takes no confirmation.
Established recruiting procedures shipped with the platform. No configuration, no template library to maintain — and nothing for a manager to keep current as the team turns over.
A pasted brief becomes a parsed intake card — the terms lifted into fields, and whatever the brief leaves open named rather than guessed at.
Every open role is measured against its own benchmark. Where one is short, candidates already in the pool are matched and scored — and nobody is contacted until the row is ticked.
Everyone in play carries a reliability score and the reason behind it, so a pipeline can be read by risk rather than by stage alone.
Connect a read-only ATS credential and review the first brief in the same session.
hamrr